Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. In addition, materials from third-party renderers other than mental ray do not display properly. Render target array GShader Sphere. High dynamic range lighting Teapot Competitors included Nvidia ‘s Quadro -branded and to some extent Tesla -branded product series and Intel’s Xeon Phi -branded products.

Uploader: Dushura
Date Added: 21 September 2008
File Size: 16.81 Mb
Operating Systems: Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X
Downloads: 41502
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]

ATI FirePro V4800 – graphics card – FirePRO V4800 – 1 GB – Smart Buy

Shortly after that we got our hands on the new FirePro V and V cards that made up the mid-range and budget professional offerings. You’re not signed in.

I have been told by AMD executives that there is a lot of exciting stuff in the works that will leverage the GPU-compute power of the FirePro cards, and mad I can say is, hurry up guys: With Mudbox, the professional graphics cards really set themselves apart from the consumer cards, as the software likes having lots of RAM on the video card.

AMD has quite the powerful line-up of professional graphics cards, from high-end monsters all the way down to its entry-level contenders.

ATI FirePro V Specs | TechPowerUp GPU Database

I would have liked to include some GPGPU benchmarks in this review, but until we have appropriate software in which to perform the tests, it seems better to hold c4800.


A quarter century tour; a Space Marine’s job is never done.

What is the UBM value for money rating? Latest News Latest Videos. For the Mudbox tests, each card was evaluated in two different ways. Ajd FirePro V takes seventh, and b4800 V brings up the rear at number eight. The FirePro line is designed for compute intensive, multimedia content creation such as video editorsand mechanical engineering design software such as CAD programs. Market Share Market Share trailing 30 days.

It includes a 2GB frame buffer but drops from shader processors to You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

Moving on down the list, we have the V Specs for the V are as follows: From a performance standpoint, the V does a decent job keeping up with its bigger siblings when working on light-to-moderate scenes.

Instead it uses technology based on advanced DirectX-based pixel shaders b4800 achieve its final render output, and it does it in near real time.

AMD FirePro V & FirePro V Review – Phoronix

Remember that I said earlier that pro cards have more on-board RAM? Some have embraced this technology as the future of rendering, while others simply do not feel that GPU renderers cannot live up to their CPU-based counterparts in terms of output quality.


Place in performance rating. Having said that, I have had some requests to include Cinebench tests in my various reviews — so congratulations, Cinebench: We’ve got no test results to judge. Also, look out for ad icon to see what offers come from international shops. Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more.

For all intents and purposes it is a refresh of the RX released just 10 months prior. Render output units 2 Unified shaders: Benchmarks Real world tests of the unknown.

So, FirePro W or V? As you ajd see from the scores above, the V takes the crown here, followed closely by the V Our first article looked at the new architectural benefits that Evergreen brought to the professional market so you will definitely want to start there if this is your first run through of the latest generation of cards from AMD.

Specifications Full list of technical specs. The FirePro V was spotlighted in that piece. Is Topre Realforce the Realthing?