FX 8350 BULLDOZER OR PILEDRIVER DRIVER
The Bulldozer based FX had a 3. In our conclusion to last year’s FX review I wrote the following: From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Oh, by the way, tell me what you see on page 2 of the following AMD document: Username or Email Address. Nexiuz is a game that, even with Vsync disabled has a frame cap at 63 frames per second. Views Read Edit View history.
|Date Added:||1 March 2012|
|File Size:||56.38 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
AMD’s FX-8350 analyzed: Does Piledriver deliver where Bulldozer fell short?
TechSpot Account Sign up for freeit takes 30 seconds. Brazos had a mild update, Llano paved the way for Trinity which is now shipping, and around a year after Zambezi’s launch we have Vishera: Username or Email Address Password. This is the same CPU core that is used in Trinity, but it’s optimized for a very different purpose here in Vishera.
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. This newsletter may contain advertising, deals, or affiliate links.
Bulleozer shows Piledriver to be nine percent faster, but wPrime shows only very small performance advantage, one to two percent, in favor of Piledriver. Retrieved 7 January Email Required, but never shown. Looking at our Counter-Strike: All these similarities make it easy to compare TDPs and clock speeds between the new parts and the old:.
AMD FX and FX Piledriver Review – TechSpot
AMD’s FX analyzed: Does Piledriver deliver where Bulldozer fell short? – ExtremeTech
Even more, you can trust the cpuid return value. This page was last edited orr 21 Decemberat Nexiuz is a game that, even with Vsync disabled has a frame pileedriver at 63 frames per second. Interestingly, as an aside, the FX is clocked at the same 3. Does Piledriver deliver where Bulldozer fell short? Sign up now Username Password Remember Me.
For more comparisons be sure to check out our performance database: Retrieved from ” https: The fastest model, the AK, featured two Piledriver modules operating at 4. One thing we can conclude off the bat — Vishera delivers some of the clock speed Bulldozer promised. Since it launched, Sunnyvale has laid off thousands, is preparing to lay off thousands morecancelled its first set of 28nm chips based on the Bobcat architecture, and has lost ground overall in the PC market.
Global Offensive results shown above we can see that Piledriver offers a measurable advantage over Bulldozer.
For the server market, three versions were stated to be under development: Its performance fell short of the then 9-month-old Sandy Bridge processors and in some cases, even failed to surpass the Phenom II range.
These should provide confirmation about FMA3 not being present in Bulldozer.
Bulldozer’s floating-point unit featured a complete redesign with improvements to support many new instructions while also allowing resource sharing between cores. As a fabless semiconductor manufacturer, Bulldozfr is now at GF’s mercy when it comes to moving process technology forward.
Add your comment to this article You need to be a member to leave a comment. When AMD created Bulldozer, it promised that it could offer strong scaling while sharing core resources.